MiamiDade County superintendent reveals plans for new school year in address

last_img

Is NSF feeling the Trump effect on clean energy

first_img Sign up for our daily newsletter Get more great content like this delivered right to you! Country Email Country * Afghanistan Aland Islands Albania Algeria Andorra Angola Anguilla Antarctica Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Armenia Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bhutan Bolivia, Plurinational State of Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Bouvet Island Brazil British Indian Ocean Territory Brunei Darussalam Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cape Verde Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad Chile China Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia Comoros Congo Congo, the Democratic Republic of the Cook Islands Costa Rica Cote d’Ivoire Croatia Cuba Curaçao Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Falkland Islands (Malvinas) Faroe Islands Fiji Finland France French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon Gambia Georgia Germany Ghana Gibraltar Greece Greenland Grenada Guadeloupe Guatemala Guernsey Guinea Guinea-Bissau Guyana Haiti Heard Island and McDonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City State) Honduras Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran, Islamic Republic of Iraq Ireland Isle of Man Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jersey Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Korea, Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, Republic of Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Lao People’s Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libyan Arab Jamahiriya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macao Macedonia, the former Yugoslav Republic of Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Martinique Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Moldova, Republic of Monaco Mongolia Montenegro Montserrat Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Niue Norfolk Island Norway Oman Pakistan Palestine Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Pitcairn Poland Portugal Qatar Reunion Romania Russian Federation Rwanda Saint Barthélemy Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Martin (French part) Saint Pierre and Miquelon Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Samoa San Marino Sao Tome and Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Sint Maarten (Dutch part) Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands South Sudan Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Svalbard and Jan Mayen Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syrian Arab Republic Taiwan Tajikistan Tanzania, United Republic of Thailand Timor-Leste Togo Tokelau Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of Vietnam Virgin Islands, British Wallis and Futuna Western Sahara Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe By Jeffrey MervisMay. 9, 2017 , 3:00 PM The Trump effect may have swept over the National Science Board this morning.The presidentially appointed oversight body for the National Science Foundation (NSF) is considering whether to revise a portion of the agency’s statistical bible because it might be seen as out of step with the new administration’s views on renewable energy research.“Given the current climate—I mean, political situation—in Washington, I’m wondering whether highlighting [clean energy] is something we still want to do,” board member G. P. (Bud) Peterson asked today during the board’s review of the next edition of Science & Engineering Indicators, a biennial compendium of global trends in science and technology. The National Science Foundation’s oversight board is discussing whether to continue featuring advances in clean energy technologies, such as this parabolic trough solar power plant, in its periodic statistical tome.center_img The worrisome language is a 17-page section on global investments in clean energy technologies that is slated to appear in the 2018 edition of Indicators due out in January. The discussion of clean energy has doubled in size since it first appeared in the 2012 edition. It is part of a chapter examining trends in industry R&D, one of eight in the authoritative report.As president of the Georgia Institute of Technology in Atlanta, Peterson knows that President Donald Trump’s 2018 budget proposal would slash federal support for basic energy research, which is done predominantly on U.S. campuses like his. But he and other board members never mentioned that elephant in the room. And Geraldine Richmond, chair of the board committee that oversees Indicators, swears that the discussion was not motivated by politics.“None of us wants to see Indicators become politically driven,” says Richmond, a chemistry professor at the University of Oregon in Eugene. “We would lose all our credibility if that happened.”Richmond says panel members were focused on keeping Indicators on the cutting edge in monitoring research developments. Peterson and others were simply asking whether clean energy still warranted a special place in the report, she adds. NSF analyst Derek Hill had noted earlier that the industry chapter will for the first time contain a brief discussion of the Internet of Things (IOT), a phrase that describes the increasing interconnectivity of consumer products. And that fact struck a chord with Peterson.When clean energy was added to the 2012 report, it “was a new and emerging topic,” he said. “So my question is, ‘IOT is, but is clean energy?’”Another board member took the next step. “I don’t have an opinion about if we [drop] it,” explained Ruth David, a former senior official in the U.S. intelligence and national security community based in Gordonville, Texas. “But if we do, the logic would be that we’re trading out a more mature issue for an emerging issue.”Richmond polled the board and reports she found unanimous support for pursuing the topic. “I thought it was a good idea and something that should go forward, and people nodded their heads,” she says. Richmond says the next step is for the entire 24-member board to discuss the idea in the context of whether the chapter should include a fluctuating section on emerging technologies that would reflect the state of the science at a particular time.Board members are scheduled to get another crack at reviewing Indicators this summer before it goes into final production. Richmond said that schedule gives the board plenty of time to decide both whether clean energy should remain in the 2018 edition and whether subsequent versions should feature an analysis of one or more emerging technologies. Click to view the privacy policy. Required fields are indicated by an asterisk (*) Randy Montoya/Sandia Labs/Flickr (CC BY-NC-ND 2.0) Is NSF feeling the Trump effect on clean energy?last_img read more